Skip to content
Bag Notes

Ping long iron

Ping i240 4-iron

Players cited with it
5
From 7 reports.
Released
2025
First cited here by Matt Fitzpatrick, March 2026. Last reported .
Reviewers
Praised for feel and workability
From 4 reviews. What they said

$599.99

Checked Sep 23, 2026. Verify at the retailer.

Some links here are affiliate links. If you buy through one, Bag Notes earns a commission, at no extra cost to you.

Players cited with this

  • Neal ShipleyPRESS
    “Neal Shipley has a new Ping i240 4-iron this week with reduced offset”
    Read the report
  • Matt FitzpatrickPRESS
    “The club Fitzpatrick used to hit that shot was Ping’s i240 with Ping’s CFS shaft, a club he platoons with his 7-wood and put back into the bag for the final round.”
    Read the report
    1 more report from Matt Fitzpatrick
    • “He uses the company’s i240 model for his 4-iron with the venerable S55 iron which has been out on tour for more than a decade.”
      Read the report
  • Tyrrell HattonPRESS
    “Like his driver, Hatton has used Ping irons for a decade now, with the more forgiving i240 model featuring in 4-iron to 6-iron and the Blueprint S from 7-iron to pitching wedge.”
    Read the report
    1 more report from Tyrrell Hatton
    • “Tyrrell Hatton uses Ping i240 irons (4-6) with Nippon Modus3 Tour 120 X shafts”
      Read the report
  • Allisen CorpuzPRESS
    “Allisen Corpuz uses a Ping G440 5-iron and Ping i240 irons (6-UW) with Nippon Modus 105 S shafts”
    Read the report
  • Lydia KoPRESS
    “Lydia Ko uses Ping i240 irons”
    Read the report

What reviewers say

Based on 4 reviews (2 press, 2 video), newest October 2025

What press and YouTube reviews of the Ping i240 4-iron judged, by what buyers compare. Open any line for the quotes behind it.

Where it shines

  • Feel
  • Workability
  • Looks at address
  • Distance
  • Forgiveness
  • DistanceMostly positive: Leans positive.Long for their loft with good gapping, not max-distance irons.2 reviews›

    Praise (4)

    • “good sort of carry number for me.”

      VideoMichael Newton Golf, Michael Newton · July 2025Watch at 8:06

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “really happy with the gapping.”

      VideoMichael Newton Golf, Michael Newton · July 2025Watch at 7:16

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “they are long for their lofts.”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 2:17

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “I think they're about half a club to a club um longer than my set per um per club”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 2:19

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    Complaints (1)

    • “if you're looking for pure distance and power and ball speed, this probably isn't the eye in you want to be looking at.”

      VideoMichael Newton Golf, Michael Newton · July 2025Watch at 2:33

      About the model family, not this exact version.

  • ForgivenessMostly positive: Leans positive.Forgiving player irons, though distance drops on off-center strikes.3 reviews›

    Praise (4)

    • “the off-centre stability and high launch window will be enticing to those with slightly less speed and predictability of flight”

      PressGolf Monthly, Joe · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “the high-toe miss-hit did not replicate Ping irons of old, and had quite positive results from a data level too.”

      PressToday's Golfer · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “right away they are forgiving player irons.”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 3:17

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “these are some of the easiest hitting player long irons I've ever tried.”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 4:56

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    Complaints (1)

    • “You will lose distance as you move away from the sweet spot and no doubt about it.”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 3:28

      About the model family, not this exact version.

  • FeelRated highly: Reviewers rate it highly.Soft, consistent feel widely praised, though a few prefer rivals.4 reviews›

    Praise (8)

    • “the star of the show being the exceptionally soft feel”

      PressGolf Monthly, Joe · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “Impact feel has dramatically improved from its predecessor”

      PressGolf Monthly, Joe · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “Oh, that's a gorgeous feel.”

      VideoMichael Newton Golf, Michael Newton · July 2025Watch

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “it feels quite soft like a forge product.”

      VideoMichael Newton Golf, Michael Newton · July 2025Watch at 2:11

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “Significantly improved consistency in feel across the face”

      PressToday's Golfer · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “The result is a smooth, soft feel, with an inoffensive noise off the face.”

      PressToday's Golfer · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “I find them solid and slightly soft on impact.”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 1:34

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “they're not harsh on mish hits.”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 1:38

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    Complaints (1)

    • “Sure, there are better feeling irons out there, such as the TaylorMade P7CB or Mizuno Pro S-3.”

      PressToday's Golfer · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

  • WorkabilityRated highly: Reviewers rate it highly.Easy to shape and flight shots for skilled players.3 reviews›

    Praise (4)

    • “The workability and soft feel will very much appeal to the better player”

      PressGolf Monthly, Joe · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “were easy to manipulate if you needed to flight it down.”

      PressToday's Golfer · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “I believe you can play any shot shape your skill level allows.”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 2:02

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “you can shape them and flight them as you need.”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 7:10

      About the model family, not this exact version.

  • Turf interactionNot covered by enough reviews
  • Looks at addressRated highly: Reviewers rate it highly.Attractive, tour-inspired shape, though one disliked the carbon badge.4 reviews›

    Praise (7)

    • “they just sit extremely well at address, enticing you to hit them”

      PressGolf Monthly, Joe · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “It's a great looking iron.”

      VideoMichael Newton Golf, Michael Newton · July 2025Watch

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “it's a beautiful sort of shape.”

      VideoMichael Newton Golf, Michael Newton · July 2025Watch at 1:47

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “look at the front to back again it's relatively tight for that long iron which I really sort of like”

      VideoMichael Newton Golf, Michael Newton · July 2025Watch at 7:30

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “It’s certainly a tour-inspired look, and one could argue that the look down at address is more important than the shelf appeal in the bag.”

      PressToday's Golfer · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “The head shape and profile are perfect to my eyes.”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 0:49

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “They frame the ball beautifully.”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 0:58

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    Complaints (2)

    • “find the carbon effect badge just a little fussy for my preferences”

      PressGolf Monthly, Joe · July 2025Read the review

      About the model family, not this exact version.

    • “I thought it was an odd cosmetic choice”

      VideoGolfer Geeks · October 2025Watch at 1:17

      About the model family, not this exact version.

  • ValueNot covered by enough reviews

A criterion needs at least two reviews from different sources before it gets a verdict.

Specifications

Length
38 1/2"
Loft
22.5°
Power spec loft
22.0°
Retro spec loft
24.5°
Lie angle
59.8°
Offset
0.17"
Bounce
6.0°
Swingweight
D1

Copied from the manufacturer’s own page, not measured by us.

Players who use this also use

Browse all long & utility irons

Photo credits